Write a One-Paragraph Summary free essay sample

Proposition 203 In its findings and declarations PROP 203 states that the government and public schools of Arizona are obligated to provide Arizona’s children, regardless of their background, proper skills to be successful. The English language is amongst the most important of these skills. It was discovered that the public schools of Arizona were not doing an adequate job at educating these children but were wasting money on unsuccessful, experimental language programs. In conclusion, public schools in Arizona are required to teach English to these children as rapidly and effectively as possible. All the children in Arizona shall receive nearly all classroom instruction in English. Their materials and books shall be in English and all subject matter shall be taught in English. For English Language Learners (ELL) the curriculum and the way it is presented shall be differentiated in a way for students who are learning the English language. They may be educated separate from the mainstream classroom for a period of the day but the pull-outs should not exceed a year. We will write a custom essay sample on Write a One-Paragraph Summary or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Once they have learned proper English and are able to complete their school work in English, then they will be placed into mainstream English classrooms. To monitor the children’s educational progress of subject matter and the learning of the English language, a standardized, nationally-normed written test shall be administered in English. The only children exempt from this test are those students who have been classified as severely learning disabled. These issues will affect my classroom weather I want them to or not. I have to assure that no matter what the child’s ethnical background, or their native language, they are receiving the appropriate education. Under the state-imposed standards, these students are not being treated equal simply by being provided with the same facilities, textbooks, teachers, and curriculum. Students who do not understand English are then being denied of any meaningful education as they do not have access to what is being presented. Due to Chinese-speaking minorities receiving fewer benefits than English-speaking majorities, clarifying guidelines were issued. The district must take the necessary steps to fix the language deficiency in order to include the students who do not speak English. Also, if students are ability grouped, the program must be designed to meet language skills as soon as possible and must not be a permanent track. Although Lau v. Nichols was essentially the same issue as the other lawsuits, I believe I would have a more difficult time teaching students of an ethnical background other than Hispanic. Even these students though should always be provided with what they need. Their education as young children will be the building blocks of a lifetime therefore they must always be provided with a meaningful education. I may not be able to provide them with instructions in Chinese but I will always assure to refer them to an ELL specialist so that they can be provided with the tools they need. Proposition 203, The Flores Consent Decree, and Lau v. Nichols all end up tying back to the same issue. That is minorities who do not speak English and the education system. Many school districts do not take the appropriate measures to provide meaningful education that is the building blocks of a child’s life time.